Data-Driven Risk Management in Universities: Application of Analytics and Predictive Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31489/2026FEB1/1393Keywords:
Data-driven risk management, Universities, Predictive models, Learning analytics, Enterprise risk managementAbstract
Modern universities operate in an environment of increasing uncertainty caused by digital transformation, financial instability, demographic change, competition for students and academic staff, cybersecurity threats, and rising expectations from regulators and society. Traditional risk management in higher education often remains fragmented, reactive, and insufficiently connected with strategic decision-making. The purpose of this study is to develop a conceptual and applied framework for data-driven risk management in universities through the integration of enterprise risk management, key risk indicators, dashboards, learning analytics, and predictive models. The study is conceptual-applied in nature and is based on a review of international literature on enterprise risk management, learning analytics, early warning systems, predictive analytics, and digital governance in higher education. The methodology includes system analysis, comparative analysis, risk mapping, maturity assessment, and conceptual modelling. The results propose an integrated data-driven ERM framework consisting of five components: risk data architecture, risk taxonomy, key risk
indicators, predictive models, and governance response mechanisms. The study also presents illustrative risk
indicators, risk thresholds, a risk scoring matrix, and examples of predictive model application for academic,
financial, digital, human resource, operational, and reputational risks. The findings show that analytics and
predictive models can transform university risk management from a formal control function into a proactive, measurable, and evidence-based governance system. The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of applying the proposed framework in higher education institutions, including universities in Kazakhstan, to improve risk identification, early warning, strategic planning, and institutional resilience.
References
Bañeres, D., Rodríguez, M. E., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Karadeniz, A. (2020). An early warning system to detect at-risk students in online higher education. Applied Sciences, 10(13), 4427.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134427
Bañeres, D., Rodríguez, M. E., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Cortadas, P. (2023). An early warning system to identify and intervene online dropout learners. International Journal of Educational Technology in
Higher Education, 20, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00371-5
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2017). Enterprise Risk Management — Integrating with Strategy and Performance. COSO. Retrieved from
https://www.coso.org/enterprise-risk-management
Cui, Y., Chen, F., Shiri, A., & Fan, Y. (2019). Predictive analytic models of student success in higher
education: A review of methodology. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(3/4), 208–227.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-10-2018-0104
International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines. ISO. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html
Khaw, T. Y., & Teoh, A. P. (2023). Risk management in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Quality Assurance in Education, 31(2), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-04-2022-0097
de Oliveira, C. F., Sobral, S. R., Ferreira, M. J., & Moreira, F. (2021). How does learning analytics contribute to prevent students’ dropout in higher education: A systematic literature review. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 5(4), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5040064
Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist,
57(10), 1380–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213498851
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research
on artificial intelligence applications in higher education — Where are the educators? International Journal
of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
