A Decade of Debate: A Bibliometric Analysis of Minimum Wage Research in Economics (2015–2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31489/3136-0807/2026-1-1/6-20Keywords:
minimum wage, wage policy, labor market inequality, income distribution, bibliometric analysis, VOSviewer, wage gap, co-authorship, economic policy, gender disparityAbstract
This paper provides a full-scale bibliometric analysis of the academic research output on the topic of minimum wage policies in economics from 2015 to 2025. Leveraging a rigorously constructed data sample of 4,195 WoS CC-indexed records, the research delves into the intellectual structure, thematic progression, and authorship patterns in the field. Visual network analysis through VOSviewer and statistical summarization with Microsoft Excel are used to map co-authorship networks, keyword co-occurrence, and citation networks, while identifying emerging trends and knowledge gaps. The results show a significant surge in scholarly interest in minimum wage studies after 2020, which reflects the economic uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Key themes among these papers are
gender wage gaps, informal labor markets, the role of education and family patterns in wage mechanisms,
and the links between wage policy, health equity, and social protection. Methodologically, the most successful work is based on panel data, natural experiments, and decomposition methods. Yet substantial gaps remain in interdisciplinary connections, particularly with respect to the relationship between wage policy, automation, climate change, caregiving, and public health. This review
not only presents the current status of minimum wage literature, but also provides strategic directions for theoretical development in the future. By focusing on underexplored areas and suggesting more comprehensive and interdisciplinary solutions, the research is relevant to larger debates on wage justice, economic justice, and labor policy formation with the aim of contributing to international development objectives.
References
References
(2020). OECD. Employment outlook 2020: Worker security and the COVID-19 crisis. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/1686c758-en
(2022). ILO (International Labour Organization). Global wage report 2022-2023: The impact of infla-tion and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power. www.ilo.org. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/publications/flagship-reports/global-wage-report-2022-23-impact-inflation-and-covid-19-wages-and
Aguinis, H., Ramani, R. S., & Alabduljader, N. (2018). What you see is what you get? Enhancing methodological transparency in management research. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 83-110. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0011
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1), 361-362. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
Bernhardt, A., Jacobs, K., & Reich, M. (2014). Local minimum wage laws: Impacts on workers, fami-lies and businesses. IRLE Working Paper Series. Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Univer-sity of California, Berkeley. https://irle.berkeley.edu/publications/working-papers/local-minimum-wage-laws-impacts-on-workers-families-and-businesses/
Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2017). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(3), 789-865. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20160995
Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Myth and measurement: The new economics of the minimum wage. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691169125/myth-and-measurement?srsltid=AfmBOopBYS7h583tfTp5uY71Nwki6YoZPEZ26Jvqa8RhEjmEyB5fIqRF
Neumark, D., & Wascher, W.L. (2008). Minimum wages. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262515085/minimum-wages/
Pabon, L., Del Carpio, X. 2014. Minimum Wage Policy : Lessons with a Focus on the ASEAN Re-gion.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for biblio-metric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
